Financial-condition comparison

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY vs JOHNS HOPKINS

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Credit union

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

CUMBERLAND, MD

Health score

88.0

Total assets

$659.9M

View full profileData through 2026-Q1

Credit union

JOHNS HOPKINS

Baltimore, MD

C+

Health score

72.2

Total assets

$648.6M

View full profileData through 2026-Q1

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

Lower problem-loan measure

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

Metric	FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY	JOHNS HOPKINS
TFS health score	88.0/100Leads	72.2/100
Total assets	$659.9M	$648.6M
Total deposits / shares	$557.6M	$548.5M
Net worth ratio	13.46%Leads	12.35%
Return on assets	1.15%Leads	0.77%
Return on equity	8.58%Leads

Branch and market overlap

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

20 branches

JOHNS HOPKINS

4 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: MD.

CFPB complaint coverage

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

Unavailable

JOHNS HOPKINS

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

0 in TFS registry

JOHNS HOPKINS

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY

JOHNS HOPKINS

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

• No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
• Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
• Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare FIRST PEOPLES COMMUNITY with similar peers

JOHNS HOPKINS

APL

SECURITYPLUS

FREEDOM OF MARYLAND

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.