Financial-condition comparison

ILA 28 vs MOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH

This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”

Build another comparison

Credit union

ILA 28

Pasadena, TX

B+

Health score

83.6

Total assets

$10.5M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Credit union

MOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH

Arlington, TX

D-

Health score

52.8

Total assets

$10.7M

View full profileData through 2026-Q2

Answer first

Different strengths, no blanket winner

ILA 28 leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.

Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.

Category leaders

Where each institution leads

Financial health

ILA 28

Higher TFS health score

Capitalization

ILA 28

Higher comparable capital ratio

Profitability

ILA 28

Higher return on assets

Lending quality

ILA 28

Lower problem-loan measure

Same-source detail

Financial metrics

Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.

MetricILA 28MOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH
TFS health score83.6/100Leads52.8/100
Total assets$10.5M$10.7M
Total deposits / shares$8.2M$8.8M
Net worth ratio21.56%Leads16.93%
Return on assets0.99%Leads-0.81%
Return on equity4.58%Leads-4.79%
60+ day delinquency0.00%Leads2.84%
Net charge-offs0.00%Leads3.37%
Efficiency ratio——
Loan-to-deposit ratio78.21%67.75%
Asset growth (YoY)——
Deposit / share growth (YoY)——
Branches11
Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only——

Branch and market overlap

ILA 28

1 branches

MOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH

1 branches

Both institutions report branches in 1 state: TX.

CFPB complaint coverage

ILA 28

Unavailable

MOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH

Unavailable

Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.

Regulatory-action context

ILA 28

0 in TFS registry

MOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH

0 in TFS registry

Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.

Quarterly history

Health and profitability trend

QuarterILA 28 scoreILA 28 ROAMOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH scoreMOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH ROA
2026-Q175.4/1000.19%49.2/100-2.96%
2026-Q283.6/1000.99%52.8/100-0.81%

Keep watching

Watch either institution—or both

Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.

ILA 28
MOUNT OLIVE BAPTIST CHURCH

Coverage boundaries

What this does not conclude

  • • No product-rate, fee, or customer-service winner without product data.
  • • Complaint comparisons appear only when both institutions have reviewed mappings and the same complete source window.
  • • Regulatory actions are displayed separately and are not included in category scoring.

Related comparisons

Compare ILA 28 with similar peers

Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.