This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Paramus, NJ
Health score
57.3
Total assets
$78.1M
Bank
Kearny, NJ
Health score
70.6
Total assets
$151.2M
Answer first
Five Rivers Bank leads on capitalization and lending quality and growth; Schuyler Savings Bank leads on financial health and profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Schuyler Savings Bank
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Five Rivers Bank
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Schuyler Savings Bank
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Five Rivers Bank
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Five Rivers Bank
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Five Rivers Bank | Schuyler Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 57.3/100 | 70.6/100Leads |
| Total assets | $78.1M | $151.2M |
| Total deposits / shares | $49.8M | $118.0M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 57.11%Leads | 14.07% |
| Return on assets | -8.08% | 0.20%Leads |
| Return on equity | -14.25% | 1.38% |
Five Rivers Bank
1 branches
Schuyler Savings Bank
2 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: NJ.
Five Rivers Bank
Unavailable
Schuyler Savings Bank
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Five Rivers Bank
0 in TFS registry
Schuyler Savings Bank
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Five Rivers Bank score | Five Rivers Bank ROA | Schuyler Savings Bank score | Schuyler Savings Bank ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | — | — | -0.14% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | — | — | -0.11% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | — | — | 0.05% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | -6.40% | — | 0.07% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | -7.02% | — | 0.13% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | -7.28% | — | 0.18% |
| 2026-Q1 | 63.9/100 | -10.04% |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| Non-performing loans | 0.00%Leads | 0.36% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Efficiency ratio | 464.46% | 90.92%Leads |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 37.72% | 107.58% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 147.70%Leads | 9.57% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | — | 9.99% |
| Branches | 1 | 2 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 71.5/100 |
| 0.21% |
| 2026-Q2 | 57.3/100 | -8.08% | 70.6/100 | 0.20% |