This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Onarga, IL
Health score
76.6
Total assets
$140.1M
Bank
Cherry, IL
Health score
73.5
Total assets
$137.6M
Answer first
Federated Bank leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality and growth; State Bank of Cherry leads on capitalization. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Federated Bank
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
State Bank of Cherry
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Federated Bank
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Federated Bank
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Federated Bank
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Federated Bank | State Bank of Cherry |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 76.6/100Leads | 73.5/100 |
| Total assets | $140.1M | $137.6M |
| Total deposits / shares | $119.2M | $105.5M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 8.88% | 11.63%Leads |
| Return on assets | 1.20%Leads | 0.89% |
| Return on equity | 8.37%Leads |
Federated Bank
5 branches
State Bank of Cherry
1 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: IL.
Federated Bank
Unavailable
State Bank of Cherry
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Federated Bank
0 in TFS registry
State Bank of Cherry
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Federated Bank score | Federated Bank ROA | State Bank of Cherry score | State Bank of Cherry ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 0.87% | — | 1.68% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 0.83% | — | 1.71% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 0.75% | — | 1.66% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | -0.35% | — | 1.68% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 0.13% | — | 1.60% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 0.29% | — | 1.45% |
| 2026-Q1 | 76.1/100 | 1.64% |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| 7.87% |
| Non-performing loans | 0.20%Leads | 0.50% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01%Leads | 1.09% |
| Efficiency ratio | 74.92% | 66.49%Leads |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 74.78% | 87.11% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 11.83%Leads | 0.87% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 13.16%Leads | -2.05% |
| Branches | 5 | 1 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 78.1/100 |
| 1.02% |
| 2026-Q2 | 76.6/100 | 1.20% | 73.5/100 | 0.89% |