This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Springfield, MN
Health score
73.7
Total assets
$139.8M
Bank
Warroad, MN
Health score
63.3
Total assets
$138.3M
Answer first
Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield leads on financial health and profitability and growth; Security State Bank of Warroad leads on capitalization and lending quality. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Security State Bank of Warroad
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Security State Bank of Warroad
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield | Security State Bank of Warroad |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 73.7/100Leads | 63.3/100 |
| Total assets | $139.8M | $138.3M |
| Total deposits / shares | $120.7M | $119.9M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 8.70% | 16.41%Leads |
| Return on assets | 1.34%Leads | 0.69% |
| Return on equity | 15.46% |
Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield
2 branches
Security State Bank of Warroad
2 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: MN.
Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield
Unavailable
Security State Bank of Warroad
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield
0 in TFS registry
Security State Bank of Warroad
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield score | Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Springfield ROA | Security State Bank of Warroad score | Security State Bank of Warroad ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 1.18% | — | 0.57% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 1.29% | — | 0.55% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 1.53% | — | 0.57% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 1.67% | — | 0.58% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 1.66% | — | 0.62% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 1.62% | — | 0.73% |
| 2026-Q1 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| 5.70% |
| Non-performing loans | 4.48% | 4.17%Leads |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01%Leads | 0.07% |
| Efficiency ratio | 61.64%Leads | 69.86% |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 72.43% | 56.34% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 5.21%Leads | -2.27% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 6.30%Leads | -4.39% |
| Branches | 2 | 2 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 72.3/100 |
| 1.18% |
| 62.1/100 |
| 0.69% |
| 2026-Q2 | 73.7/100 | 1.34% | 63.3/100 | 0.69% |