This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Credit union
Fond du Lac, WI
Health score
56.6
Total assets
$6.9M
Credit union
Green Bay, WI
Health score
79.3
Total assets
$13.3M
Answer first
COMPASSIONATE CARE leads on lending quality; SERVICE leads on financial health and capitalization and profitability. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
SERVICE
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
SERVICE
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
SERVICE
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
COMPASSIONATE CARE
Lower problem-loan measure
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | COMPASSIONATE CARE | SERVICE |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 56.6/100 | 79.3/100Leads |
| Total assets | $6.9M | $13.3M |
| Total deposits / shares | $6.2M | $10.3M |
| Net worth ratio | 10.47% | 22.11%Leads |
| Return on assets | -0.72% | 0.64%Leads |
| Return on equity | -6.87% | 2.91% |
COMPASSIONATE CARE
2 branches
SERVICE
1 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: WI.
COMPASSIONATE CARE
Unavailable
SERVICE
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
COMPASSIONATE CARE
0 in TFS registry
SERVICE
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | COMPASSIONATE CARE score | COMPASSIONATE CARE ROA | SERVICE score | SERVICE ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-Q1 | 49.9/100 | -0.65% | 80.2/100 | 0.70% |
| 2026-Q2 | 56.6/100 | -0.72% | 79.3/100 | 0.64% |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Every valid pair is viewable; pairs enter search automatically only when current data, comparability, and visitor interest meet the publication rules.
| 60+ day delinquency | 0.00%Leads | 0.03% |
| Net charge-offs | 2.99% | -0.00%Leads |
| Efficiency ratio | — | — |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 66.05% | 95.28% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | — | — |
| Branches | 2 | 1 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |