This comparison uses public regulatory filings and TFS methodology. It evaluates financial condition—not checking rates, account fees, service quality, or which institution is universally “best.”
Bank
Brunswick, NE
Health score
76.6
Total assets
$175.6M
Bank
Cedar Rapids, NE
Health score
75.1
Total assets
$174.9M
Answer first
Brunswick State Bank leads on financial health and profitability and lending quality and growth; Cedar Rapids State Bank leads on capitalization. Those category leads describe current regulatory metrics only and do not establish a universal product or service winner.
Capital and asset-quality definitions are directly comparable for this pair.
Category leaders
Financial health
Brunswick State Bank
Higher TFS health score
Capitalization
Cedar Rapids State Bank
Higher comparable capital ratio
Profitability
Brunswick State Bank
Higher return on assets
Lending quality
Brunswick State Bank
Lower problem-loan measure
Growth
Brunswick State Bank
Higher year-over-year asset growth
Same-source detail
Winner markers appear only where the metric definitions are comparable and both values are available.
| Metric | Brunswick State Bank | Cedar Rapids State Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TFS health score | 76.6/100Leads | 75.1/100 |
| Total assets | $175.6M | $174.9M |
| Total deposits / shares | $158.6M | $157.4M |
| Tier 1 capital ratio | 9.39% | 9.55%Leads |
| Return on assets | 1.25%Leads | 1.10% |
| Return on equity | 13.41%Leads |
Brunswick State Bank
3 branches
Cedar Rapids State Bank
3 branches
Both institutions report branches in 1 state: NE.
Brunswick State Bank
Unavailable
Cedar Rapids State Bank
Unavailable
Counts use an explicitly reviewed CFPB-company-to-regulatory-ID mapping and the same complete 12-month window. Parent-company attribution can include complaints involving affiliates. Lower complaint volume is context—not proof of better service or less consumer harm.
Brunswick State Bank
0 in TFS registry
Cedar Rapids State Bank
0 in TFS registry
Institution-level actions come from TFS's exact regulatory-ID registry and are shown as factual context only. They do not affect category winners or the TFS Financial Health Grade. A zero means no action is currently published in this curated registry—not proof that none exists.
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Brunswick State Bank score | Brunswick State Bank ROA | Cedar Rapids State Bank score | Cedar Rapids State Bank ROA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-Q3 | — | 1.71% | — | 0.62% |
| 2024-Q4 | — | 1.71% | — | 0.78% |
| 2025-Q1 | — | 1.63% | — | 1.39% |
| 2025-Q2 | — | 1.51% | — | 1.42% |
| 2025-Q3 | — | 1.50% | — | 1.44% |
| 2025-Q4 | — | 0.97% | — | 1.08% |
| 2026-Q1 | 74.5/100 |
Keep watching
Get access to your dashboard watchlist and future financial-grade alerts.
Coverage boundaries
Related comparisons
Financial data comes from FDIC BankFind Suite or NCUA Call Reports as labeled. TFS Health Grades are an editorial assessment, not an official government rating or financial advice. Arbitrary comparison pairs are available dynamically but remain noindex unless curated for data completeness and user value.
| 11.63% |
| Non-performing loans | 1.30%Leads | 1.73% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.87%Leads | 0.00% |
| Efficiency ratio | 60.95% | 57.47%Leads |
| Loan-to-deposit ratio | 93.51% | 92.21% |
| Asset growth (YoY) | 2.41%Leads | 1.92% |
| Deposit / share growth (YoY) | 2.41%Leads | 1.85% |
| Branches | 3 | 3 |
| Published CFPB complaints per $1B deposits (12 months)verified mappings only | — | — |
| 1.16% |
| 81.8/100 |
| 1.30% |
| 2026-Q2 | 76.6/100 | 1.25% | 75.1/100 | 1.10% |